SUPREME COURT RULES FOR RELIGION AND WRONGLY

June 30, 2023 -Durt Fibo

The US Supreme Court today ruled 6-3 in favor of an unemployed web designer in Colorado who refused to create websites celebrating same-sex weddings out of her supposed religious objections, which she asserted are Christian. That the case climbed all the way up to the Supreme Ayatollahs was due to maximum dark moneyed thaumaturgy. The plaintiff is merely a vessel; this was orchestrated under the direction of religious pushers. One cannot integrate religion into statecraft, internal or external. Of the estimated 4,000 religions existent, nearly every one has requirements which are heretical or blasphemous or “offensive” to the others, so it becomes a mathematical impossibility to enforce them as political laws. In a recent example: On Wednesday, a man in Sweden burned a copy of the Quran. His name is Salwan Momika, and he is an Iraqi national with refugee status in Sweden. In his approved application for the action, he wrote that he wished to emphasize the importance of freedom of speech, specifying: “I want to protest in front of the large mosque in Stockholm, and I want to express my opinion about the Quran … I will tear up and burn it. … This is democracy. It is in danger if they tell us we can’t do this.” After then encouraging mass protests (and ‘allowing’ hundreds to storm the Swedish Embassy in Baghdad -mostly followers of Muqtada Sadr), now Iraqi Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ahmed al-Sahhaf has announced: “A man who desecrated the Holy Quran is the citizen of Iraq. That is why we demand that the Swedish government extradite him to Iraq to face trial in accordance with the Iraqi law.” But even basic “insults’ to religion in Iraq are condemned with fines and up to three years in prison (Iraqis are all required to register their religion with the state, and by law Muslims may not change their religious designation). The potential sentence, which could in fact be far worse than the starting sentencing guidelines, however, goes against Sweden’s own laws, which state extradition for political offenses is only permitted if the act is an offense according to Swedish law.